I’ve got a new paper out in PNAS (here, open access) on testing space-for-time substitution using fossil pollen data. The main message: the assumption that they are substitutable is valid, at least over broader scales of space and time!
I’ve got a new paper out in PNAS (here, open access) on testing space-for-time substitution using fossil pollen data. The main message: the assumption that they are substitutable is valid, at least over broader scales of space and time!